With our
mania for beauty contests and preference for catchy bumper stickers, American
elections are all too often scrubbed of substantive content. That may well explain in part why we live in
a country with such a poorly informed electorate. Judging by the weeks since Mitt Romney secured
the GOP nomination, 2012 seemed to be following the same tired script. That was particularly troublesome because
down on the ground the country has been caught in a sometimes-vicious tug of
war between opposing philosophical views that speak to the very nature of our
democracy. So while the campaign talk
ranges from glib to vague, we stand at a very real crossroad. The turn we take now may actually determine
our road to the future.
I have
long felt that, despite some surface similarities, the differences between our
two major parties are significant. It
did matter that Jack Kennedy became president in 1960 and that George W. Bush
prevailed in 2000. Yes it’s often hard
to differentiate been Democratic and Republican administrations in foreign
policy. Regardless who sits in the White
House, we’re still the same superpower that must react somewhat consistently to
events and situations largely out of our control. On the domestic side however, the place where
we actually live, the divide has been getting larger the differences more
transparent. Here we are in control. Different policy can and does make a difference.
It is in
that context that I think Mitt Romney has made an excellent running mate
choice. In a sense the chameleon of
American politics has decided to run on a clearly articulated and documented
philosophy. Perhaps it’s emblematic of
his candidacy that from here on in he will be running on someone else’s (yet
another) record. Think of that what you
may, but Paul Ryan’s record puts the right-left divide into sharp campaign relief,
much sharper than was the case just two days ago. And that’s a really good thing.
It has
long been said that budgets are where the philosophical rubber hits the
road. It’s not what we say, but how we
gather and then allocate our resources. Budgets
ultimately boil down to what we’re spending and what we’re cutting. As such they remain the best reflection of
our national and local priorities.
Ryan’s budget (and everyone calls it that because he is its principal
author) isn’t some vague pronouncement but is concrete
—
hard fast numbers
embedded in a bill passed by the Republican dominated House. Romney now has a record driven by a clear
ideology behind which he must stand and which he must defend. He has made a choice and that’s exactly what
we will have to do.
Some
partisans will rush to say that Romney committed political suicide on
Friday. Not so fast. Vice Presidential choices have rarely decided
elections one way or another. Whatever
strengths are bringing Romney the nomination might get him to the
presidency. Ryan may have views with
which you or I might disagree, but he is a fresh and youthful face who will now
be paired against a much older and established counterpart. If Vice Presidents stand as symbols for the
future that could be meaningful, though perhaps not with a 51-year-old
President in good health leading the ticket.
We don’t know how Ryan will perform on this much larger national stage or how the
Romney-Ryan combo will stand up against Obama-Biden. Elections aren’t over until they’re over, and
one should be wary about suicide predictions.
The last time was when G.H.W. Bush named his Veep choice. Remember President Bush and Vice President
Quayle?
Ryan is
an excellent choice because it might force both campaigns to engage seriously
on their philosophical differences and where the country should be headed. How, who and at what level should citizens be
taxed? What kind of safety net should a
great democracy provide for its citizens?
What are our priorities say for example between education and
armaments? What is the government’s
responsibility, and through it the citizen’s responsibility, for things we all
use like our infrastructure? How should
the government intersect with our private lives and how separated should church
and state be?
Even with
a more ideologically defined race, don’t expect all of these issues to be
addressed, certainly not with total clarity.
After all this is America where those who speak seriously about issues
are branded wonks and nerds.
But perhaps we can look forward to something more this time around.
Regardless
as to how the next months will play out, we Americans are faced with a clear
choice this election cycle. We deserve
to understand not only the issues facing us but that we are in fact making a
defining choice when casting our ballots.
Mitt Romney may not have given us much until this point, but hopefully
his excellent choice will make us all stand up and take notice — give us greater reason to vote for or
against him in November. For me, if
anything, voting against him and for Barack Obama is even more of a no-brainer.
No comments:
Post a Comment